Overwritten.net

Community => General Discussion => Topic started by: Pugnate on Monday, September 18, 2006, 08:43:22 AM

Title: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
Post by: Pugnate on Monday, September 18, 2006, 08:43:22 AM
BBC LINK (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/5355546.stm)

Can't cut and paste with the pics.
Title: Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
Post by: idolminds on Monday, September 18, 2006, 08:51:00 AM
Heh, thats kind of cool.
Title: Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
Post by: ender on Monday, September 18, 2006, 08:59:17 AM
This guy is my hero.
Title: Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
Post by: scottws on Monday, September 18, 2006, 09:12:14 AM
I like how they gave him "serious criticism."
Title: Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
Post by: Xessive on Monday, September 18, 2006, 10:19:43 AM
Haha in the pursuit of art anything is plausible :P
Title: Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
Post by: Ghandi on Monday, September 18, 2006, 10:20:28 AM
Very cool. Took me a while to figure out which one was him in the picture.  :P
Title: Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
Post by: scottws on Monday, September 18, 2006, 10:53:46 AM
Is he even in the picture?  I took it to be just a picture of the statues, not of him standing with the statues.
Title: Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
Post by: Cobra951 on Monday, September 18, 2006, 11:54:16 AM
2nd from the left?  It really is hard to tell.  The hand is what makes me think that's a real human.
Title: Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
Post by: scottws on Monday, September 18, 2006, 11:56:22 AM
I really don't think that he is in the picture.  The caption simply describes the statues, and what, was this security guard down there walking around snapping pictures?  No, he was looking for the guy.
Title: Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
Post by: Ace_O_Spades on Monday, September 18, 2006, 01:51:30 PM
I'm glad he didn't damage any of the statues in the process. I find it pretty cool actually... Too bad he didn't make it for longer.
Title: Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
Post by: Quemaqua on Monday, September 18, 2006, 07:59:44 PM
Yeah, it's a cool idea.  Had he damaged something I'd be pissed, but this kind of thing is always cool if you don't fuck up and break something.  I love reading about these stunts.
Title: Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
Post by: Pugnate on Monday, September 18, 2006, 10:47:19 PM
I don't think he was in that pic either.
Title: Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
Post by: Ghandi on Tuesday, September 19, 2006, 09:23:25 AM
Look at the guy on the left- his hand is real.
Title: Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
Post by: scottws on Tuesday, September 19, 2006, 09:33:40 AM
Enlarge the image - no it's not.

Think about it.  Why would they be down there snapping pictures when they should be looking for the guy?  The answer is they weren't.  This picture was taken (or pulled from an archive) so that people would know what they were talking about in the article when they were referring to the statues and the guy posing as one.  Not for some where's Waldo.
Title: Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
Post by: Pugnate on Tuesday, September 19, 2006, 09:38:33 AM
Enlarge the image - no it's not.

Think about it.  Why would they be down there snapping pictures when they should be looking for the guy?  The answer is they weren't.  This picture was taken (or pulled from an archive) so that people would know what they were talking about in the article when they were referring to the statues and the guy posing as one.  Not for some where's Waldo.


hahahah
Title: Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
Post by: Xessive on Tuesday, September 19, 2006, 10:39:39 AM
Hehe that's what I thought when I looked at it the first time until Ghandi mentioned finding him in there! Still, I'd like to see him in full costume just to compare :P
Title: Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
Post by: gpw11 on Tuesday, September 19, 2006, 01:22:26 PM
What would be really funny is if there had been some guy living there posing for like ten years, and that's him in the stock picture.