Overwritten.net

Community => General Discussion => Topic started by: Pugnate on Friday, October 09, 2009, 02:15:09 PM

Title: Playboy must be in trouble.
Post by: Pugnate on Friday, October 09, 2009, 02:15:09 PM
Because they do seem desperate for ideas:

http://stars.ign.com/articles/103/1033645p1.html
Title: Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
Post by: idolminds on Friday, October 09, 2009, 03:03:02 PM
For fucks sake, this isn't difficult. Woman - clothes + camera = NEW ISSUE!
Title: Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
Post by: Xessive on Friday, October 09, 2009, 07:00:57 PM
Wow, that sounds pretty desperate.

Why Marge?! Why not Jessica Rabbit?
Title: Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
Post by: Quemaqua on Friday, October 09, 2009, 08:40:20 PM
That's pretty effing weird.
Title: Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
Post by: Ghandi on Friday, October 09, 2009, 08:47:38 PM
WTF
Title: Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
Post by: gpw11 on Saturday, October 10, 2009, 08:37:39 PM
Wasn't Rupaul in Playboy as well?
Title: Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
Post by: Pugnate on Saturday, October 10, 2009, 08:38:40 PM
Ron Paul?
Title: Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
Post by: gpw11 on Saturday, October 10, 2009, 08:58:51 PM
No, Rupaul the shemale.
Title: Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
Post by: Pugnate on Saturday, October 10, 2009, 09:07:26 PM
(http://www.blogcdn.com/www.tmz.com/media/2008/04/0423_rupaul_reveal_getty.jpg)


 :o
Title: Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
Post by: gpw11 on Saturday, October 10, 2009, 10:39:51 PM
Yeah, I don't know if it ever happened.  I remember it being a big deal a few years ago.
Title: Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
Post by: MysterD on Sunday, October 11, 2009, 12:38:50 PM
Ron Paul?

LOL @ The Bruno joke here (of Bruno getting RuPaul and Ron Paul mixed up).

Good one.
Title: Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
Post by: Pugnate on Sunday, October 11, 2009, 12:55:57 PM
Have not seen Bruno yet.
Title: Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
Post by: Xessive on Sunday, October 11, 2009, 02:29:57 PM
Have not seen Bruno yet.
Don't. It was a collossal waste of time and it had too many penises on screen.
Title: Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
Post by: Pugnate on Sunday, October 11, 2009, 10:10:19 PM
You mean anything more than zero?
Title: Re: Playboy must be in trouble.
Post by: Xessive on Monday, October 12, 2009, 09:46:01 AM
You mean anything more than zero?
Precisely.