Author Topic: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.  (Read 9791 times)

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,253
    • OW
Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« on: Thursday, September 30, 2010, 02:58:54 PM »
SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.....

The sad thing is that exactly one day before my business ran into problems, I had gone and paid a good sum of money for the Galaxy S. Unfortunately, in this part of the world, there is no such thing as returning something for your money back.

Until things started to look up again, I didn't even use the thing. In fact, the day things started to get a bit better for me was the day I started to use the phone, and it was only a few days before I came back to OW. Hopefully, things will not go south again soon, because I seriously believe that I will develop a stomach ulcer.

ANNNNNNNNNNYHOOOO... see this is why I left. I didn't want to crap on every thread with my depression, not that I am depressed anymore.

OK, so on to the Galaxy S:

So I have to say, that I was a lot like Sirean and Que, when it came to cellphones. Yes, I was that guy. Back in the late 90s, a lot of my rich and even not so rich friends had cellphones, and I found them to be useless because:

a) It cost $200 for a cheap cellphone.
b) Gandhi loves goat sex, and giving handjobs to farm animals.
c) You could do very little with the device aside from call and be called.
d) What the fuck sorta student needs to be reached 24/7?
e) Cellphones required ridiculously shackling year long contracts.
f) The minutes you paid for were deducted even when you were receiving calls.
g) It was significantly cheaper to have a dedicated landline.

In the end, the convenience of a cellphone wasn't worth the many expenses, and a lot of my friends were getting cells simply to show off. I did get a cellphone in 2001, but that was when it was actually cheaper to get a cellphone than a landline. Until then, whenever the subject of cellphones came up, I was that guy to go on a rant about why they were stupid. When I finally did get a cellphone, I shocked a lot of friends, much like Que shocked us when he got his...

OK OK so the Galaxy S:









My last smart phone was using Nokia's Symbian, which felt very little like a smartphone OS. I've used older iterations of Android on other phones though. This, uses the Android 2.1 OS, which is fantastic. It is like having PC in my pocket.

Some cool things about the Galaxy S.

1. It features a SUPERAMOLED screen. What is AMOLED? It is the future of television. In 5 years, they say all TVs will be using AMOLED, because it has the color depth, richness, and excellent viewing angles of a plasma, coupled with the sleekness, power efficiency, and brightness of an LCD. It is only financially practical to make cellphone sized screens for now, but in half a decade, they should be rolling out TVs.

The screen itself is better in terms of color and brightness than the latest iPhone. It has a slightly lower screen resolution though.

2. The interface is the best I've seen on an Android phone, and that's because it uses a custom Samsung skin. Now, this was the big reason I was hold off on buying a Galaxy S, because Samsung are pretty poor at software, but here, it is an actual improvement. I was initially going with the HTC Android phone, until I read what engadget and the mega all-things-Samsung-cellphone-related hater, Gizmodo, had to say about the Galaxy interface, and yes, Samsung's skinning largely complements Android, though, if you dig just a touch, you find the familiar Android interface at work.

To be honest, the Samsung skin makes the phone feel like an advanced version of the iOS (iPhone skin), which makes the phone feel like it has the best of both worlds.

I am not sure if this is the same on all Android 2.1 phones, but with the Galaxy S you can have up to 7 desktops, which you can customize with your program shortcuts i.e. widgets. The desktop wallpaper is sorta divided between the dekstops, and as you scroll through the desktops, you scroll through the wallpaper. It is quite neat.

3. The phone's OS, Android 2.1, is pretty sweet. Right now, if you want to decide on a smart phone OS, you either go for Apple's iOS, or Android. Both Windows Mobile 6.5 and Symbian OS feel very prehistoric at the moment, and both have huge updates to come. So you are down to Google or Apple.

As Apple said, the iOS vs Android debate is a lot like the Mac vs PC debate. I think the Android is just a superior OS. It feels like you are using a PC, and you have a lot of control, with access to a lot of operating information, and a PC like interface to boot. You can install, uninstall, suspend, limit, partially limit, modify programs much like you would on a PC . It is also completely open, and features complete multitasking (I am running about 10 programs at once), allows the use of flash etc.

What they nailed was keeping the complexity under the hood. You can have a very simplified experience if you want to.

4. Typing can be handled through Swype, which can making typing extremely fast. Here is a short vid of how it works:



Pretty cool. You basically run your finger from letter to letter, and it takes care of the rest.

5. Gaming is one area where it is definitely behind the iOS. However, last night, I spent three hours playing a tower defense game called "Robo Defense". Now, it may have been because it was my first tower defense game, but the game had me hooked like anything. I couldn't believe I was unable to let go of a cellphone game. Overall though, the games are pretty much behind the iPhone, but robodefense is sweet.

6. The Camera isn't brilliant, and lacks an LED light or a Xenon flash, but in decent light conditions, it isn't bad.

7. One cool thing is the top drop down menu, which can be accessed at any time, and has shortcuts to key features like running programs, wifi, GPS etc.

The phone's interface is really fast, but still a touch behind the iOS. Apparently the upcoming Android 2.2 update will improve that aspect of it. The battery life is pretty good for a Samsung phone, though again, the Android 2.2 update is supposed to improve that aspect of the phone by quite a bit.

So yea, overall, the phone is brilliant. It is like having an actual PC in my pocket. There are a dozen widgets and apps tailor made for Android. I have been using applications made by The Onion, Engdaget, and TED, and they are excellent to use. Browsing the internet, accessing e-mail, gmail, faceboook, youtube etc all feel like very natural experiences, and it is all lightning fast. I was using Google Maps in a remote part of this crazy country the other day, and it was guiding me perfectly well.

The Andorid marketplace, while filled mostly with garbage, has also a lot of excellent and highly useful applications.

It always felt like a bit of a handicap to try to get any sort of work done with Symbian, and also felt like a bit of a novelty. With Android it feels very easy and very natural.

Offline scottws

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6,607
    • Facebook Me
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #1 on: Thursday, September 30, 2010, 03:13:37 PM »
I have a BlackBerry Tour, but the Android 2.1 and 2.2 phones have had me salivating for months.  I think I am going to wait until I see an Android 3 phone first though.  I hear that there is still some polish to be had.

Offline iPPi

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3,159
  • Roar!
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #2 on: Thursday, September 30, 2010, 03:20:19 PM »
I hear the Galaxy S is a great Android phone.  The drawback is terrible battery life (or so I hear). 

I've got an SE Xperia X10 which runs Android 1.6 (should have a 2.1 update in October or November) and the battery life, depending on if I have 3G on or not can last about 2-3 days of usage before needing a charge.

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,253
    • OW
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #3 on: Thursday, September 30, 2010, 04:36:25 PM »
Yea I have to charge every two days if I am on Wifi extensively. It isn't great, but I haven't had great battery times with any of Samsungs.

The Galaxy S was supposed to get 2.2 last month but it was pushed back. I'd rather they test extensively, as I am in no hurry for flash support. Even after they offer 2.2, I am going to wait a few weeks to see how everyone else is doing with their upgrade.

I wonder if my phone will go to 3.0.

The reason I have doubts is because 3.0 is supposed to have higher hardware requirements, though the hardware on this thing is apparently top of the line.

edit:

According to Techradar:

Quote
Android 3.0 phones will require at least a 1GHz processor, 512MB of RAM and 3.5-inch or larger displays.

Read more: http://www.techradar.com/news/phone-and-communications/mobile-phones/android-3-0-details-you-need-to-know-706243#ixzz113jickx8


While the Galaxy S meets those requirements, I doubt Samsung would work towards a 3.0 upgrade.

Offline iPPi

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3,159
  • Roar!
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #4 on: Thursday, September 30, 2010, 05:38:11 PM »
Yea, I kind of regret getting my phone because I want the Galaxy S now.

Sony Ericsson is kind of behind the ball with their software updates.  SE is going to push the 2.1 upgrade sometime in late October to November, and they haven't announced anything about an upgrade to 2.2 so there is some doubt whether or not the phone will get 2.2.  Oh well, at least the phone is aesthetically one of the better looking smartphones out there.

Offline Xessive

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9,920
    • XSV @ deviantART
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #5 on: Thursday, September 30, 2010, 06:09:24 PM »
Congratulations man!

I've been contemplating the Galaxy S, since I love my Omnia. I've also been thinking about the upcoming HTC Desire HD.

Although with the insane UAE deals on the iPhone 4 I might just go for that; iPhone 4 16GB for ~$135 and 32GB for ~$230 USD with a 1-year contract. It might just be too good to pass up.

Offline Ghandi

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4,804
  • HAMS
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #6 on: Thursday, September 30, 2010, 08:49:23 PM »
I see what you did there.

Offline gpw11

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7,182
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #7 on: Friday, October 01, 2010, 12:16:46 AM »


I've got an SE Xperia X10 which runs Android 1.6 (should have a 2.1 update in October or November) and the battery life, depending on if I have 3G on or not can last about 2-3 days of usage before needing a charge.

I can't for the life of me figure out why they released this phone with 1.6 at a time when 2.0/2.1 was the norm.   I mean, it doesn't make a huge difference (as far as I know), but it's a flagship device.  As for the regret, phones are like PC hardware; there's always something better around the corner.  Best just not to think about it.

Congratulations man!

I've been contemplating the Galaxy S, since I love my Omnia. I've also been thinking about the upcoming HTC Desire HD.

Although with the insane UAE deals on the iPhone 4 I might just go for that; iPhone 4 16GB for ~$135 and 32GB for ~$230 USD with a 1-year contract. It might just be too good to pass up.

I was a big Omnia fan and it provided a lot of functionality that neither iOS or Android can provide to this day, but I kind of feel like I was living in the stone age when I look back to it and compare it with Android in some respects.  The UI and integration of Android is unbelievable coming from WinMo.  But seriously, with those prices, the iPhone 4 is a great deal.

Anyways, congratulations Pug.  I'm more and more satisfied with my Milestone/Droid as time goes on and am perfectly happy with a custom 2.1 build as of right now.  I am, however, itching a bit for 2.2 support  as Flash and some of the other features (Gmail updating as an app rather than an OS update....and install to SD without root) would really improve the experience.

If you guys have friends with Android devices, you should look into Tikl.  Push to Talk over 3g/wifi.  Great quality.

Offline beo

  • Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,480
  • ****
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #8 on: Friday, October 01, 2010, 02:29:12 AM »
like xessive, i was tempted with this phone, but am waiting for the desire hd instead (only a couple of weeks to go).

as a side note, i recently started working for vodafone, so i'll get it free with 50% off on the contract. :P

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,253
    • OW
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #9 on: Friday, October 01, 2010, 02:41:14 AM »
I actually did a lot of research on the Galaxy S vs the Desire HD. I was slightly leaning towards the Desire HD, but unfortunately HTC has no presence here, unless I buy without warranty, which I am afraid to do. :(

Quote
I can't for the life of me figure out why they released this phone with 1.6 at a time when 2.0/2.1 was the norm.   I mean, it doesn't make a huge difference (as far as I know), but it's a flagship device.  As for the regret, phones are like PC hardware; there's always something better around the corner.  Best just not to think about it.

haha yea what you say, except you can't upgrade your phone's hardware. The mobile phone market is pretty brutal in that regard. The Galaxy S 2 is apparently ready for next year.

Regarding why they released it on 1.6, I have a feeling that it takes a lot of Q&A to get these updates out of the door. I think MS probably made the right decision because releasing earlier than they were able to with the *promise* of upgrading meant better sales than just waiting till they were able to do the software upgrade.

Samsung was supposed to do the 2.2 on Galaxy S months ago, but it seems the process isn't as simple as all that, and they are continuously apologizing and holding back.

Of course with the release of Desire HD around the corner, it may have been a tactical reason to hold off on 2.2 to steal some of HTC's thunder.


Offline ren

  • Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,672
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #10 on: Friday, October 01, 2010, 05:51:10 AM »
Who's still a cell phone holdout? I got one as soon as I started driving (16) so my parents were comfortable and barely used it for much else. But after starting university I don't think my social, academic or working life could exist without it.

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,253
    • OW
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #11 on: Saturday, October 02, 2010, 01:48:55 AM »
If someone can say to me that they are still holding out on a cellphone on principle in this day and age, I guess a part of me will have some respect for them. Having said that, a modern smartphone is so much more than a cellphone.

Regarding Desire HD, it is in stores here, and the place I got my Galaxy S from is telling me they will let me trade in for $65... so I am considering it. Hmmmmm...

edit:

Did some research, and the Desire HD seems to be slower than the Galaxy S:

http://smartphonebenchmarks.com/

And that's Desire HD using 2.2 and the Galaxy S using 2.1

2.2 is apparently 30% faster than 2.1, so the Galaxy S will only get faster.

Also, the Galaxy S has a really fast GPU alongside its CPU, which apparently the Desire HD doesn't.

I also prefer the SuperAMOLED to the LCD screen, though the Desire HD's screen is a bit bigger.

Also, I can't believe the Galaxy S doesn't have a flash light for its camera. Definitely a win for the Desire HD in that regard.

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,253
    • OW
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #12 on: Saturday, October 02, 2010, 01:56:35 AM »
Well, I found a lively debate here:

http://androidforums.com/htc-desire-hd/177848-desire-hd-vs-galaxy-s.html

Quote
I can't make up my mind either. Have to get one or the other. Here is my perspective on things, as I first posted in the Desire HD vs iPhone 4 thread:

SGS wins over DHD on:
- Super AMOLED screen (no need to say more)
- Gorilla Glas protects the screen
- Batterylife (SGS is almost on par with iPhone 4, and the DHD have a smaller battery, and the talktime and standby time according to htc.com is a lot less than that of the SGS).
- Camera performance (according to GSMarena it beats iPhone 4)
- It comes preloaded with swype. I would just looooooove to swype :-)
- 119 gram vs 164 gram of the DHD
- SGS is big but slim. DHD might be just a tad too big.

DHD wins over Galaxy S:
- Better build quality (no plastic)
- Generally more pretty
- HTC Sense owns Touchwiz 3.0
- Locations (preloaded maps etc.)
- HTCsense.com
- It might be bigger in the pocket, but the screen is bigger to look at :-)
- Dual LED flash for those rare but critical "a bad picture is better than no picture"-situations

There are a lot of differences between these two phones, but the above mentioned ones is the ones I say make a difference for me.

I do not take into consideration the bugs with the SGS lag and its GPS problems, because I expect those to be fixed, and also its getting the Froyo before I need to purchase (Am getting the phone 1st of January, but have to decide/order now, its a company phone).

I tend to lean towards the DHD, but batterylife is a big showstopper for me, if it can't last a full day, without me worrying wether it will die on me or not.


Quote
Galaxy S:
Better CPU, better GPU

Desire HD:
Faster data were available (14.4 Mbps down 5.76 up)


Quote
Galaxy S Pros:

Slightly Faster (mainly GPU I believe) (though with lag bugs atm but set to be fixed)
FFC
Probably better Sound Quality (the HD SQ is unknown but I have heard the Galaxy S SQ is excellent the HD has a lot to live up to).
Super AMOLED display.
Lighter
Potentialy massive aftermarket community (released on all 4 major carriers in the US and selling incredibly well elsewhere).
Headphone slot on the top
Potential for extended battery is higher with a removeable back
Higher internal Memory.
Available now
Swype Pre-loaded
Gorilla glass screen.
More pocketable (not by a lot, but it is smaller).
Better Video quality (some Desire HD video captures have been uploaded on XDA, general consensus is that they are not that great).

Desire HD pros

Probably better camera (mexapixels don't mean everything so we can't be sure)
Bigger screen
Regular pixel config not pentile matrix like on SAmoled.
Sense = better than Touchwiz
New sense features on top of this.
Nicer build quality.
Boot time
Made by a more reliable company.
Better GPS (presumably)
Extra Ram
Notification light (I think).
Camera Flash.
Potentially faster Data (14.4 Mbps down 5.76 up)

I am going to go check out the Desire HD later. If I like it, I may trade in for it. I actually like the HTC interface better, and the .5 inch bigger screen is a plus, but the shorter battery life is a bit of a worry. I really miss having a flash for those shots at night, but apparently Samsung's camera sensor is really good.

Hmmmm... I will have to go check it out today.

Offline PyroMenace

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3,930
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #13 on: Saturday, October 02, 2010, 02:07:21 AM »
Which Galaxy is it? Is it the epic from Sprint?

Offline beo

  • Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,480
  • ****
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #14 on: Saturday, October 02, 2010, 05:08:57 AM »
My main reason for waiting is the sense UI, I've got used to it on the hero and love it. In my opinion it's miles ahead of touchwiz - i'd go so far as to say that touchwiz is a downgrade to stock Android.

Offline Xessive

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9,920
    • XSV @ deviantART
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #15 on: Saturday, October 02, 2010, 05:41:49 AM »
Yeah, I wasn't a fan of the TouchWiz on my Omnia either. I basically wound up installing a 3rd party shell (I juggled between PointUI Home2 and SPB Mobile Shell).

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,253
    • OW
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #16 on: Saturday, October 02, 2010, 09:16:13 AM »
Which Galaxy is it? Is it the epic from Sprint?

I think all four Galaxy S phones are pretty similar. I think the Galaxy S Vibrant is what is sold all over.

My main reason for waiting is the sense UI, I've got used to it on the hero and love it. In my opinion it's miles ahead of touchwiz - i'd go so far as to say that touchwiz is a downgrade to stock Android.

Yea I was waiting for the Desire HD because of the sense UI.

Having used touchwiz over on the Samsung Jet and Omnia HD, I wasn't too impressed, and had my reservations about the Galaxy S because of it. But then I read a Cnet review that praised touchwiz 3.0 on the Galaxy S, and I decided to risk it.

It actually isn't bad, and an improvement overall. Still not sense though.

I went to check out the Desire HD, but they still didn't have it, even though the guy told me over the phone that they did. Should be any day though.

Offline gpw11

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7,182
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #17 on: Saturday, October 02, 2010, 12:09:51 PM »
I really don't mind the stock, "Google Experience" UI on the Droid/Milestone, but Sense does intrigue me (thank god for custom roms).  Do you, however, have the option to turn it off?  That would be key for me. 

But yeah, Touchwiz on the Omnia really really sucked. I have heard that the Android version is miles better though.



Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,253
    • OW
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #18 on: Saturday, October 02, 2010, 05:52:00 PM »
Yea I've been looking at the difference between Touchwiz 3.0 on Galaxy S and previous iterations, and yea, significant improvement.

Again, not nearly as good as HTC's Sense.

Offline Ghandi

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4,804
  • HAMS
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #19 on: Saturday, October 02, 2010, 09:51:49 PM »
My phone is excellent for making phone calls, sending texts and taking really, really shitty pictures. The sound on it is great. I got it for almost nothing and the monthly payments are relatively cheap. I suppose it would be classified a stupid phone and I couldn't love it more.

Continue on.

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,253
    • OW
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #20 on: Sunday, October 03, 2010, 05:38:17 AM »
Just discovered the Galaxy S natively supports FLAC. Not sure if this is an android thing, but pretty cool.

Offline Xessive

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9,920
    • XSV @ deviantART
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #21 on: Sunday, October 03, 2010, 09:13:16 AM »
Awesome! Samsung have been pretty great with format support lately. I was impressed at the time when I discovered my Omnia could play DivX videos.

I never really use FLAC audio format since it's pretty huge compared to classic MP3.. also I'm not an audiophile, so MP3 at 192kbps or even 160kbps will do it for me.

Offline gpw11

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7,182
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #22 on: Sunday, October 03, 2010, 02:54:51 PM »
The Omnia's drag and drop divX support was great, something which doesn't seem to be available on Android phones out of the box.  I did just find a media player by the name of RockPlayer, that does support DivX though...and plays it well.  I'd check it out.

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,253
    • OW
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #23 on: Sunday, October 03, 2010, 05:12:16 PM »
I've got an excellent pair of Steelseries headphones. The difference between FLAC and medium level mp3 is pretty clear, and a lot of my music is on FLAC.

The only problem is that obviously FLAC files are pretty huge.

DivX support is nice, but aside from youtube, I never find myself watching a video on a mobile device like a cellphone or a handheld, unless it is something I've captured. Music, I do listen to on the go.

Offline PyroMenace

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3,930
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #24 on: Sunday, October 03, 2010, 09:31:01 PM »
Ive been meaning to make a thread about headphones since I just bought a pricey gaming set.

Offline gpw11

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7,182
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #25 on: Sunday, October 03, 2010, 09:43:42 PM »
Yeah, I rarely watch video as well, but it does come in handy to have something on there that you can watch during unexpected periods of waiting or rainy ass days where you hit up a bike at the gym or something.

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,253
    • OW
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #26 on: Monday, October 04, 2010, 01:23:08 AM »
Ive been meaning to make a thread about headphones since I just bought a pricey gaming set.

I did a bit of research before buying, and the two best headphones were a set from Razer and another from Steelseries. The Steelseries set was apparently a bit better, so I went for it:

http://steelseries.com/products/audio/steelseries-siberia-v2-usb

There is also a slightly cheaper colored variation without the USB soundcard thing. But I decided to go for it when using my laptop.

The headphones are just awesome. They are great for gaming, but I use them mostly for music. When I listen to something with a high frequency, like Libera or Opera, there is no "popping" at high frequencies.

I highly recommend them.

You can check out the reviews on the link.

Offline Xessive

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9,920
    • XSV @ deviantART
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #27 on: Monday, October 04, 2010, 06:59:23 AM »
I've been considering the Razer headsets, if I feel like a big spender I'd go for the Megalodon otherwise I'm thinking about the modest Piranha. I thought about the Orca too but when I saw it in the shops I realized I'm just not a that big a fan of green.

My cousin got himself the Logitech G35 and it is pretty sweet. The one major difference it has compared to other headsets is that its controls are all directly on the device, it doesn't have an anchored control unit or any extras between it and the PC. That seems to be the biggest factor in choosing between it and other sets of the same calibre.

Anyway, it was after trying them out for myself that I truly heard the difference in audio fidelity, especially compared to my current headset the Logitech Digital Precision.

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,253
    • OW
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #28 on: Monday, October 04, 2010, 09:52:04 PM »
My only issue with Razer products is that they are fairly fragile, as outstanding as they are otherwise.

The Razer DeathAdder:



My last Razer mouse would double click even when single clicked, and a bit of research revealed it was a very common problem. I sent the mouse back to Razer in Hong Kong, and they sent me a brand new replacement. This new one, after six months, has lost the use of one of its shoulder buttons.

The logitech MX518 on the other hand is a TANK:



I bought one that lasted five years, and then I bought another to use as a temp. replacement till Razer sent me a new mouse. The temp I gave to my brother once the shipment from Razer came in.

You can spill coke on it, drop it, have your cats jump on it, but the MX518 will continue to run like an armored vehicle.

Unfortunately I love my Razer DeatherAdder far too much to let it go.

I am considering a third DeathAdder in two years, because it is awesome. It is like the Ferrari of mice. It feels perfect, and it is zomgs (I hate you idol) oh so precise.

« Last Edit: Tuesday, October 05, 2010, 07:55:14 AM by Pugnate »

Offline Xessive

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9,920
    • XSV @ deviantART
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #29 on: Tuesday, October 05, 2010, 05:30:31 AM »
That's how I feel about my Razer Abyssus:



The Mirror Edition has a glossy finish, I have the standard which has a smooth, matte, rubber texture (which I prefer). It feels great, it's the perfect size for my hand, and it's "zomgs oh so precise" too ;D I also love the wheel on it.

I have to point out that it is a basic mouse, just the basic left-click, right-click, middle-click, and wheel; no extra buttons.

I also got my hands on the Razer Orochi, here's a comparison with the Mamba:



It's major feature is that it can be switched between wired/wireless (bluetooth) on the fly. In terms of product quality it is impeccable save for one thing: I hate the damn wheel. It feel surprisingly cheap and loose. I am also prone to accidentally click the wheel when I'm trying to scroll up, which is not my issue with other mice. Aside from that it's a great little peripheral for the portable PC gamer.

Offline Cobra951

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8,934
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #30 on: Tuesday, October 05, 2010, 07:46:55 AM »
Who's still a cell phone holdout? I got one as soon as I started driving (16) so my parents were comfortable and barely used it for much else. But after starting university I don't think my social, academic or working life could exist without it.

I'm not a cell-phone holdout.  I'm a smartphone holdout.  I've had this clamshell LG phone for about 4 years now.  It flips open, lets me call out, receive calls, and stores missed and received calls.  It's compact, functional and conveniently shaped for the use it gets.  That's all I want (though I can also use it as an alarm clock, music player, video player . . .).  Verizon keeps wanting to sell me these computers that also act as phones, and I keep turning them down.  I suppose one day I won't have a choice, and I'll be holding some fat PDA form factor to my ear.

Pug, I don't remember how long I've had my Logitech MX-500 mouse.  It's got to be 6 years at least.  A couple of the felt feet are gone, but it still works perfectly.

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,253
    • OW
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #31 on: Tuesday, October 05, 2010, 08:06:00 AM »
Yea to be honest I wasn't too excited with one till I got this, all credit to android. I don't think they are essential by any means, unless you need one for work or travel a lot. But for techies and geeks they can be a fun.

What I don't like is the word "smartphone". It sounds a little stupid. Nevermind that two of my threads have that word in the thread title.... :P :P
« Last Edit: Tuesday, October 05, 2010, 10:07:47 AM by Pugnate »

Offline Cobra951

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8,934
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #32 on: Tuesday, October 05, 2010, 10:03:53 AM »
Haha!  I used the word because I learned it from you guys.

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,253
    • OW
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #33 on: Sunday, October 17, 2010, 09:10:55 AM »
So the Galaxy S has gotten the 2.2 update.

I am afraid because hear HTC had some nasty problems upgrading in the past. Maybe I should wait a month.

Offline gpw11

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7,182
Re: Smartphone: Galaxy S and Android 2.1 impressions.
« Reply #34 on: Sunday, October 17, 2010, 01:57:08 PM »
I think the majority of updates go through without a hitch, but if you don't mind waiting, it might not be a bad idea.  At the very least, I'd check some forums (XDA maybe?) to see what the word on the street is regarding bugs.