Author Topic: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.  (Read 4457 times)

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,236
    • OW
(Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
« on: Monday, September 18, 2006, 08:43:22 AM »
BBC LINK

Can't cut and paste with the pics.

Offline idolminds

  • ZOMG!
  • Administrator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 11,933
Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
« Reply #1 on: Monday, September 18, 2006, 08:51:00 AM »
Heh, thats kind of cool.

Offline ender

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 424
Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
« Reply #2 on: Monday, September 18, 2006, 08:59:17 AM »
This guy is my hero.

Offline scottws

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6,602
    • Facebook Me
Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
« Reply #3 on: Monday, September 18, 2006, 09:12:14 AM »
I like how they gave him "serious criticism."

Offline Xessive

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9,918
    • XSV @ deviantART
Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
« Reply #4 on: Monday, September 18, 2006, 10:19:43 AM »
Haha in the pursuit of art anything is plausible :P

Offline Ghandi

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4,804
  • HAMS
Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
« Reply #5 on: Monday, September 18, 2006, 10:20:28 AM »
Very cool. Took me a while to figure out which one was him in the picture.  :P

Offline scottws

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6,602
    • Facebook Me
Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
« Reply #6 on: Monday, September 18, 2006, 10:53:46 AM »
Is he even in the picture?  I took it to be just a picture of the statues, not of him standing with the statues.

Offline Cobra951

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8,934
Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
« Reply #7 on: Monday, September 18, 2006, 11:54:16 AM »
2nd from the left?  It really is hard to tell.  The hand is what makes me think that's a real human.

Offline scottws

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6,602
    • Facebook Me
Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
« Reply #8 on: Monday, September 18, 2006, 11:56:22 AM »
I really don't think that he is in the picture.  The caption simply describes the statues, and what, was this security guard down there walking around snapping pictures?  No, he was looking for the guy.

Offline Ace_O_Spades

  • Poster Child
  • ***
  • Posts: 531
Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
« Reply #9 on: Monday, September 18, 2006, 01:51:30 PM »
I'm glad he didn't damage any of the statues in the process. I find it pretty cool actually... Too bad he didn't make it for longer.
The CONtrast
...Is the conTRAST
to THE contrast...

Offline Quemaqua

  • 古い塩
  • Administrator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 16,498
  • パンダは触るな。
    • Bookruptcy
Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
« Reply #10 on: Monday, September 18, 2006, 07:59:44 PM »
Yeah, it's a cool idea.  Had he damaged something I'd be pissed, but this kind of thing is always cool if you don't fuck up and break something.  I love reading about these stunts.

天才的な閃きと平均以下のテクニックやな。 課長有野

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,236
    • OW
Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
« Reply #11 on: Monday, September 18, 2006, 10:47:19 PM »
I don't think he was in that pic either.

Offline Ghandi

  • Senior Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4,804
  • HAMS
Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday, September 19, 2006, 09:23:25 AM »
Look at the guy on the left- his hand is real.

Offline scottws

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6,602
    • Facebook Me
Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
« Reply #13 on: Tuesday, September 19, 2006, 09:33:40 AM »
Enlarge the image - no it's not.

Think about it.  Why would they be down there snapping pictures when they should be looking for the guy?  The answer is they weren't.  This picture was taken (or pulled from an archive) so that people would know what they were talking about in the article when they were referring to the statues and the guy posing as one.  Not for some where's Waldo.

Offline Pugnate

  • What? You no like?
  • Global Moderator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 12,236
    • OW
Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
« Reply #14 on: Tuesday, September 19, 2006, 09:38:33 AM »
Enlarge the image - no it's not.

Think about it.  Why would they be down there snapping pictures when they should be looking for the guy?  The answer is they weren't.  This picture was taken (or pulled from an archive) so that people would know what they were talking about in the article when they were referring to the statues and the guy posing as one.  Not for some where's Waldo.


hahahah

Offline Xessive

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9,918
    • XSV @ deviantART
Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
« Reply #15 on: Tuesday, September 19, 2006, 10:39:39 AM »
Hehe that's what I thought when I looked at it the first time until Ghandi mentioned finding him in there! Still, I'd like to see him in full costume just to compare :P

Offline gpw11

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7,180
Re: (Crazy behavior) Subtext of Art = Okay.
« Reply #16 on: Tuesday, September 19, 2006, 01:22:26 PM »
What would be really funny is if there had been some guy living there posing for like ten years, and that's him in the stock picture.