Author Topic: 8.9 earthquake hits Japan  (Read 11840 times)

Offline sirean_syan

  • Global Moderator
  • Post-aholic
  • *
  • Posts: 2,544
  • ...
Re: 8.9 earthquake hits Japan
« Reply #40 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 08:27:32 AM »
Huh. Well that's not good.

I guess I was being optimistic, but it's apparently good all these precautions/evacuations were undertaken. Sadly, that probably means that people knew how bad it was, but were covering it up while actually taking the necessary steps to protect people. At least they were moving people out.

Offline Quemaqua

  • 古い塩
  • Administrator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 16,498
  • パンダは触るな。
    • Bookruptcy
Re: 8.9 earthquake hits Japan
« Reply #41 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 08:34:43 AM »
The whole thing worries me immensely.

天才的な閃きと平均以下のテクニックやな。 課長有野

Offline idolminds

  • ZOMG!
  • Administrator
  • Forum god
  • *
  • Posts: 11,943
Re: 8.9 earthquake hits Japan
« Reply #42 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 08:53:07 AM »
Wow, that sucks.

Offline Cobra951

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8,934
Re: 8.9 earthquake hits Japan
« Reply #43 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 09:58:00 AM »
Quote
Scientists believe the amount of radiation released is only a tenth of what was released at Chernobyl, said Hidehiko Nishiyama, the chief spokesman for Japan's Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency. But the levels for radioactive iodine and cesium that have been spewed into the air, water and soil around the plant are in the thousands of trillions of bequerels -- 15 times higher than the threshold for a top-scale event, according to figures released by the safety agency Tuesday morning.
  (From the main story)

Quote
The average age of the world's 443 nuclear reactors is 25 years, according to the World Nuclear Industry Status Report.
  From a linked article within the main story

All I see reaffirms my take since Chernobyl on our current approach to nuclear power.  Sad.

Offline scottws

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6,607
    • Facebook Me
Re: 8.9 earthquake hits Japan
« Reply #44 on: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 09:59:45 AM »
Well, that will put an end to any renewed interest in nuclear fission as a source of power.